Farm Subsidy information
Morgan County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Morgan County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,624
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Morgan County, Indiana totaled $137,349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mike And Jeff Buis Partnership | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $2,478,806 |
2 | Lankford Farms Inc | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $2,031,387 |
3 | Cragen Farms LLC | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $1,940,495 |
4 | Barnard Farms Inc | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $1,846,819 |
5 | Thomas Grain Inc | Gosport, IN 47433 | $1,792,642 |
6 | Rhea Farms Inc | Clayton, IN 46118 | $1,651,585 |
7 | Jack Cook Farms Inc | Clayton, IN 46118 | $1,592,555 |
8 | D & M Cook Farms Inc | Clayton, IN 46118 | $1,191,197 |
9 | Brent Sample | Gosport, IN 47433 | $1,167,643 |
10 | William M Duckworth | Paragon, IN 46166 | $1,152,314 |
11 | Kenneth Shupe | Stilesville, IN 46180 | $1,084,898 |
12 | Rhea Family Farms Inc | Clayton, IN 46118 | $1,066,998 |
13 | Brent Milhon | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $1,008,211 |
14 | Thomas W Conner | Mooresville, IN 46158 | $935,530 |
15 | Jeremy Bright | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $935,446 |
16 | Thomas Family Farms Inc | Gosport, IN 47433 | $920,389 |
17 | Marshall Milhon | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $900,702 |
18 | John Lowry | Paragon, IN 46166 | $900,666 |
19 | R & J Farms | Morgantown, IN 46160 | $851,454 |
20 | Indy Family Farms | Greenwood, IN 46142 | $822,692 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>