Production Flexibility Program in Pike County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 896
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Pike County, Indiana totaled $8,783,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Julia J Small | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $24,429 |
102 | Hassfurther Farms Inc | Ferdinand, IN 47532 | $24,403 |
103 | Kolb Farms | Patoka, IN 47666 | $24,208 |
104 | James L Weisman | Otwell, IN 47564 | $23,798 |
105 | Frederick W Hemmer | Stendal, IN 47585 | $23,714 |
106 | Hilbert Buchta | Otwell, IN 47564 | $23,570 |
107 | Gerald L Sorgius | Otwell, IN 47564 | $23,544 |
108 | Bobby Cox | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $23,256 |
109 | Forrest Gene Brenton | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $23,145 |
110 | Scott Pride | Otwell, IN 47564 | $22,934 |
111 | Edwin R Lee | Velpen, IN 47590 | $22,564 |
112 | Kermit E Dupont | Winslow, IN 47598 | $22,482 |
113 | Seng Bros | Dubois, IN 47527 | $21,392 |
114 | Greg Johnson | Dale, IN 47523 | $21,248 |
115 | Glenn Coleman | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $21,226 |
116 | Lee M Popp | Otwell, IN 47564 | $21,058 |
117 | John Lester Gray | Otwell, IN 47564 | $20,850 |
118 | Elwood Willis | Winslow, IN 47598 | $20,484 |
119 | John L Blaize | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $20,140 |
120 | Patricia L Western | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $20,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”