Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Porter County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 96
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Porter County, Indiana totaled $280,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Henry J Kuypers Jr | Hebron, IN 46341 | $280 |
62 | Edith Young | Hebron, IN 46341 | $278 |
63 | Andrew J Blastick | Valparaiso, IN 46383 | $237 |
64 | Jed Chickadaunce | Valparaiso, IN 46383 | $225 |
65 | Jeffrey A Fry | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $215 |
66 | Verneice Buchanan | Hebron, IN 46341 | $208 |
67 | Rodakrel 2 LLC | Lambertville, MI 48144 | $200 |
68 | Suzanne M Birky Trust 210 | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $190 |
69 | Aldona Short Living Trust | Valparaiso, IN 46383 | $183 |
70 | Elaine Burke | Greentown, IN 46936 | $155 |
71 | Tyler Hartman | Valparaiso, IN 46385 | $154 |
72 | Peggy Stiffler | Ballwin, MO 63021 | $148 |
73 | Hanson Family Revocable Trust | Valparaiso, IN 46383 | $143 |
74 | Dianne E Terpstra Living Trust | Hebron, IN 46341 | $134 |
75 | Carol A Gloyeske Lt - Carol Gloyeske | La Porte, IN 46350 | $113 |
76 | Twyla Boswell Living Trust | Hobart, IN 46342 | $109 |
77 | Donna Nelson Living Trust | Hobart, IN 46342 | $109 |
78 | , | $105 | |
79 | Polly Rossi | Hebron, IN 46341 | $105 |
80 | Patti A Grieger Living Trust Dtd October 10, 2006 | Valparaiso, IN 46383 | $95 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”