Direct Payment Program in Putnam County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,107
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Putnam County, Indiana totaled $26,161,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John A Mendenhall | Danville, IN 46122 | $58,720 |
122 | Ralph C Fry | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $58,379 |
123 | Jeremiah L Martin | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $58,099 |
124 | Albert Coffman | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $56,911 |
125 | Salsman Farm Supply Inc | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $56,800 |
126 | Ralph Brown Living Trust | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $56,397 |
127 | Norris Harbison | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $56,288 |
128 | Woodson New | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $56,246 |
129 | Damien South | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $56,106 |
130 | Richard Crone | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $56,075 |
131 | Jack B Crone | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $56,075 |
132 | Joseph Allen Hardin | Danville, IN 46122 | $55,843 |
133 | Arthur L Scott Revocable Trust | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $55,791 |
134 | Keevin M Lemenager | Monrovia, IN 46157 | $55,757 |
135 | Lantrip Farms LLC | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $55,203 |
136 | Marvin Lyle Graham | Ladoga, IN 47954 | $55,064 |
137 | Dale Barker | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $54,967 |
138 | Rose Brothers Farms | Rockville, IN 47872 | $54,632 |
139 | Darrell Goode | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $54,007 |
140 | H L Mcgaughey Farms Inc | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $53,380 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”