Conservation Reserve Program in Randolph County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 842
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Randolph County, Indiana totaled $13,260,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Dale E King And Barbara J King Re | Union City, IN 47390 | $27,749 |
122 | Raymond Fouts Rev Trust | Modoc, IN 47358 | $27,412 |
123 | Stuart W Ford | Redkey, IN 47373 | $27,297 |
124 | Herbert Hunt Estate | Covington, OH 45318 | $27,291 |
125 | Jennifer Thomas | Lynn, IN 47355 | $27,041 |
126 | Max Wolfe | Winchester, IN 47394 | $26,976 |
127 | Richard A Keltner | Odessa, FL 33556 | $26,798 |
128 | William R Hendrickson | Winchester, IN 47394 | $26,569 |
129 | Phil Baker | Modoc, IN 47358 | $26,471 |
130 | James Ashmore | Losantville, IN 47354 | $26,438 |
131 | Arlo Marsh | Union City, IN 47390 | $26,320 |
132 | Ronald Whitesel Revocable Trust-ronald Whitesel | Union City, IN 47390 | $26,048 |
133 | Niles Richards | Lynn, IN 47355 | $25,852 |
134 | Richard Mark Gough | Ridgeville, IN 47380 | $25,817 |
135 | Donald J Fisher | Losantville, IN 47354 | $25,784 |
136 | Judith H Farlow | Winchester, IN 47394 | $25,685 |
137 | Bruce Davison | Union City, IN 47390 | $25,530 |
138 | Verlin - Verlin L Jo Jones | Farmland, IN 47340 | $25,064 |
139 | Ruth M Jerles | Albany, IN 47320 | $25,012 |
140 | Michael K Alka | Winchester, IN 47394 | $24,997 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”