Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Joseph County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 612
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Joseph County, Indiana totaled $5,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jerry A Zahner | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $43,440 |
22 | Mrs Cathy Zahner | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $43,440 |
23 | Arthur Snyder Farm Inc | South Bend, IN 46619 | $43,134 |
24 | Mr Randall F Szczypiorski | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $40,940 |
25 | Betty J Szczypiorski | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $40,938 |
26 | Joseph Anthony Jasinski | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $39,352 |
27 | Berger Farms Inc | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $38,703 |
28 | Donald Daube | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $36,731 |
29 | David N Maenhout | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $36,091 |
30 | Kenneth Weaver | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $34,876 |
31 | Hickory Knoll Farms Inc | South Bend, IN 46614 | $34,658 |
32 | John M Dooms | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $34,425 |
33 | Bruce Laidig | Bremen, IN 46506 | $34,407 |
34 | William Millar | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $33,979 |
35 | Kenneth E Kleine | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $33,662 |
36 | Sandra J Kleine | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $33,662 |
37 | Ort's Greene Meadows Inc | South Bend, IN 46614 | $33,377 |
38 | The Red Hen Turf Farm Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $33,108 |
39 | Richard Schmidt | Bremen, IN 46506 | $32,017 |
40 | Kenneth Sebasty Jr | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $31,333 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”