Farm Subsidy information
Saint Joseph County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Saint Joseph County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 103
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Joseph County, Indiana totaled $3,371,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Randall J Grabowski | Lakeville, IN 46536 | $1,486 |
62 | Rex Klotz | Bremen, IN 46506 | $1,473 |
63 | Gary A Taylor | Lakeville, IN 46536 | $1,418 |
64 | Darrin Klopfenstein | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $1,405 |
65 | Ginter Family Farm | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $1,365 |
66 | Robert Orlowski | South Bend, IN 46614 | $1,358 |
67 | Raymond Edward Ginter | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $1,355 |
68 | Andrew J Ginter | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $1,355 |
69 | Jonathan R Beatty | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $1,294 |
70 | Garrett Mcbride | Lakeville, IN 46536 | $1,270 |
71 | Abby Ciesielski | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $1,263 |
72 | Lester E Karn III | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $1,208 |
73 | , | $1,164 | |
74 | Suzanne M Matthys | South Bend, IN 46619 | $1,129 |
75 | Jay W Carbiener | Bremen, IN 46506 | $1,090 |
76 | Constance S Saltzgaber | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $1,080 |
77 | Gary Hochstetler | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $991 |
78 | Steven Matthys | South Bend, IN 46619 | $982 |
79 | Patricia L Fowler Revocable Trust | South Bend, IN 46614 | $951 |
80 | Gordon Martinczak | South Bend, IN 46614 | $925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”