Farm Subsidy information
Saint Joseph County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Saint Joseph County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,632
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Joseph County, Indiana totaled $153,131,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Martin E Wagner | South Bend, IN 46614 | $418,726 |
62 | Mrs Cathy Zahner | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $418,137 |
63 | Jared Berger | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $407,448 |
64 | Elaine A Sebasty | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $405,892 |
65 | Craig A Wiggins | South Bend, IN 46628 | $404,243 |
66 | Hilltop Farms Mishawaka In Inc | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $403,075 |
67 | Ronald Holderbaum | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $400,065 |
68 | Kelvin R Minix | Bremen, IN 46506 | $392,686 |
69 | Frank Kaminski Jr | South Bend, IN 46637 | $391,939 |
70 | Roger Mathia Jr | South Bend, IN 46614 | $389,249 |
71 | Wykoff Bros Farms Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $388,914 |
72 | Kurt D Laidig | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $388,092 |
73 | Gerald R Leininger | Lakeville, IN 46536 | $378,967 |
74 | Kent M Gilmer | South Bend, IN 46614 | $375,691 |
75 | Kenneth Huston | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $374,930 |
76 | Dale Jesswein | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $374,001 |
77 | David Jesswein | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $373,992 |
78 | Joan M Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $358,798 |
79 | August J Vanwanzeele | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $357,236 |
80 | Ruth Wagner | Mishawaka, IN 46545 | $356,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”