Loan Deficiency in Shelby County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,305
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Shelby County, Indiana totaled $32,008,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Welty Farms Inc | Boggstown, IN 46110 | $387,799 |
2 | Eck Family Farming Inc | Boggstown, IN 46110 | $356,627 |
3 | B & J Foltz Farms Inc | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $337,297 |
4 | L C M Farms Limited Partnership | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $326,821 |
5 | Raymond V Hamilton | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $320,357 |
6 | Walter Vaught & Sons Inc | Boggstown, IN 46110 | $298,299 |
7 | Rex Kuhn | Morristown, IN 46161 | $293,123 |
8 | David H Brown Farms Inc | Franklin, IN 46131 | $280,217 |
9 | Stephen Lemasters | Boggstown, IN 46110 | $271,537 |
10 | Keith L Theobald | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $268,795 |
11 | Foltz & Sons Farm Inc | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $264,388 |
12 | Jerry D Drake | Edinburgh, IN 46124 | $250,537 |
13 | Michael Cassidy | Waldron, IN 46182 | $247,694 |
14 | Marshall Farms LLC | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $237,726 |
15 | Kenneth Kuhn | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $232,266 |
16 | Thomas D Lux | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $222,762 |
17 | Five Oaks Farm Inc | Fountaintown, IN 46130 | $221,707 |
18 | David R Hamilton | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $220,594 |
19 | James E Douglas Jr | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $219,880 |
20 | Ronald J Hamilton | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $218,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>