Total Commodity Programs in Shelby County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 548
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Shelby County, Indiana totaled $14,970,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | R & B Kuhn Farms | Morristown, IN 46161 | $542,111 |
2 | Lantz & Corwin Farming General Partnership | New Palestine, IN 46163 | $430,132 |
3 | Spegal Family Farms LLC | Fairland, IN 46126 | $303,571 |
4 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $279,170 |
5 | Five Oaks Farm Inc | Fountaintown, IN 46130 | $272,847 |
6 | A K Farms Inc | Manilla, IN 46150 | $259,541 |
7 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $259,370 |
8 | Michael W Brown | Fairland, IN 46126 | $182,515 |
9 | Susan Fischer | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $182,086 |
10 | Mark C Fischer | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $182,086 |
11 | Mahin Farms LLC | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $167,231 |
12 | Jon Kevin Carson | Needham, IN 46162 | $158,274 |
13 | David L Stewart | Needham, IN 46162 | $152,987 |
14 | James E Douglas Jr | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $151,961 |
15 | Foltz & Sons Farm Inc | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $147,386 |
16 | Keith L Theobald | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $146,003 |
17 | Janice Theobald | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $146,003 |
18 | Doug Theobald | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $146,003 |
19 | M Renee Theobald | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $146,003 |
20 | K & L Kuhn Farms Inc | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $144,181 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>