Total Conservation Programs in Starke County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 479
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Starke County, Indiana totaled $2,300,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rodney Sanders | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $7,004 |
102 | Edward & Vera Lynn Lambert Revocable Living Trust | North Judson, IN 46366 | $6,689 |
103 | Edward G Lambert | North Judson, IN 46366 | $6,576 |
104 | Richard Dickson | Knox, IN 46534 | $6,529 |
105 | A Willard Longenecker Revocable Living Trust | Monterey, IN 46960 | $6,459 |
106 | Linda M Fitzgerald | Knox, IN 46534 | $6,381 |
107 | Robert Holm & Carolyn Holm Revocable Living Trust | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $6,313 |
108 | , | $6,171 | |
109 | Harold D Busse | Knox, IN 46534 | $6,156 |
110 | Joseph Peverelle | North Judson, IN 46366 | $6,070 |
111 | John Origer | North Judson, IN 46366 | $5,895 |
112 | Don E Smolek | Sellersburg, IN 47172 | $5,698 |
113 | James Stutzman | Etna Green, IN 46524 | $5,676 |
114 | Joshua L Workman | Culver, IN 46511 | $5,644 |
115 | Marie Kocsak | North Judson, IN 46366 | $5,621 |
116 | John A Sears | Saint John, IN 46373 | $5,567 |
117 | , | $5,540 | |
118 | Ray W Hewlett Irrevocable Trust | Knox, IN 46534 | $5,513 |
119 | James D Schultz | North Judson, IN 46366 | $5,453 |
120 | John - Roscka Living Trust Roscka | Monticello, IN 47960 | $5,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”