Farm Subsidy information
Starke County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Starke County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 514
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Starke County, Indiana totaled $6,173,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jack Awald | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $7,684 |
122 | Murray Jain | North Judson, IN 46366 | $7,681 |
123 | Soledad A Brown | North Judson, IN 46366 | $7,655 |
124 | John Piwtorak | Grovertown, IN 46531 | $7,546 |
125 | Thomas L Hayes | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $7,544 |
126 | Anna Mae Anderson | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $7,509 |
127 | , | $7,452 | |
128 | , | $7,379 | |
129 | Thomas D Bacula | Wheatfield, IN 46392 | $7,365 |
130 | Virginia Vogel Trust | Knox, IN 46534 | $7,351 |
131 | Phyllis Ford | North Judson, IN 46366 | $7,266 |
132 | Huber Land Trust % Ray Huber | Monterey, IN 46960 | $7,108 |
133 | Rodney Sanders | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $7,004 |
134 | Richard Chesak | North Judson, IN 46366 | $6,830 |
135 | Edward G Lambert | North Judson, IN 46366 | $6,576 |
136 | Richard Dickson | Knox, IN 46534 | $6,529 |
137 | Nancy Kopchik | Knox, IN 46534 | $6,518 |
138 | A Willard Longenecker Revocable Living Trust | Monterey, IN 46960 | $6,459 |
139 | Linda M Fitzgerald | Knox, IN 46534 | $6,381 |
140 | Robert Holm & Carolyn Holm Revocable Living Trust | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $6,313 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”