Conservation Reserve Program in Starke County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,483
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Starke County, Indiana totaled $51,046,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark C Smith | Knox, IN 46534 | $303,703 |
22 | George Babchuk | Crown Point, IN 46307 | $296,428 |
23 | William A Sanders Jr | Monterey, IN 46960 | $282,967 |
24 | Big Eastern % M Lucas | North Judson, IN 46366 | $280,436 |
25 | Michael Hayes | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $279,024 |
26 | Mary Roy | North Judson, IN 46366 | $276,403 |
27 | James Kopchik | Knox, IN 46534 | $274,555 |
28 | Randal Lukac | San Pierre, IN 46374 | $273,069 |
29 | Claudette - Claudett Pacilio | North Judson, IN 46366 | $272,179 |
30 | Dennis Showers | Valparaiso, IN 46385 | $267,518 |
31 | Raymond Mccarty | Grovertown, IN 46531 | $262,913 |
32 | Randall L Dickson | Grovertown, IN 46531 | $258,844 |
33 | Murray Jain | North Judson, IN 46366 | $258,079 |
34 | Leap Frog LLC | Valparaiso, IN 46385 | $253,648 |
35 | John - John Lukac Re K Lukac | North Judson, IN 46366 | $251,286 |
36 | Claudette - Claudette Pacilio Rev Trust Pacilio | North Judson, IN 46366 | $251,014 |
37 | Virginia Vogel Trust | Knox, IN 46534 | $237,532 |
38 | David Lambert | North Judson, IN 46366 | $236,749 |
39 | Robin Pflugshaupt | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $233,698 |
40 | Thomas Skronski | North Judson, IN 46366 | $231,397 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”