Conservation Reserve Program in Starke County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 531
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Starke County, Indiana totaled $2,514,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William J Bope | North Judson, IN 46366 | $21,124 |
22 | James Kopchik | Knox, IN 46534 | $20,372 |
23 | Krug Farms Inc | North Judson, IN 46366 | $20,280 |
24 | Thomas Skronski | North Judson, IN 46366 | $20,029 |
25 | Dennis Showers | Valparaiso, IN 46385 | $19,532 |
26 | Bobek Farms Inc | San Pierre, IN 46374 | $19,359 |
27 | Zagorka Micic | Cedar Lake, IN 46303 | $19,157 |
28 | Randal Lukac | San Pierre, IN 46374 | $18,961 |
29 | Terrie L Lukac | San Pierre, IN 46374 | $18,961 |
30 | Joan C Chesak Trust | San Pierre, IN 46374 | $18,053 |
31 | Andrew T Hesters | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $17,890 |
32 | Rabo Agrifinance LLC ** | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $17,806 |
33 | Boilini Family Trust | North Judson, IN 46366 | $17,572 |
34 | Carol E Black | Valparaiso, IN 46385 | $17,260 |
35 | Robin Pflugshaupt | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $16,045 |
36 | Barry Matzat | North Judson, IN 46366 | $15,567 |
37 | Stoutner Family Farm Trust | Washington, IA 52353 | $15,242 |
38 | Mark C Smith | Knox, IN 46534 | $14,998 |
39 | Mike Korous | North Judson, IN 46366 | $14,991 |
40 | Violet M Ono | North Judson, IN 46366 | $14,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”