Farm Subsidy information
Steuben County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Steuben County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 432
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Steuben County, Indiana totaled $5,172,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jim D Ordway | Fremont, IN 46737 | $4,012 |
122 | Allen D Lichlyter | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,009 |
123 | Keith A Libey | Hudson, IN 46747 | $3,920 |
124 | Kenny Brost | Angola, IN 46703 | $3,911 |
125 | Lb Farm Holdings LLC | Fremont, IN 46737 | $3,848 |
126 | David E Foster | Fremont, IN 46737 | $3,818 |
127 | Johnson Family LLC | Angola, IN 46703 | $3,810 |
128 | Paul S Christoffel | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $3,804 |
129 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $3,786 |
130 | Moody Farms LLC | Fremont, IN 46737 | $3,757 |
131 | Richard F Tritch & Mary E Tritch Rev Lv Tr | Hudson, IN 46747 | $3,754 |
132 | Joseph E Albright | Hudson, IN 46747 | $3,700 |
133 | Laurentius Van Roessel | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $3,685 |
134 | Steven L Weinhold | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $3,657 |
135 | Logan C Lochamire | Hudson, IN 46747 | $3,443 |
136 | Kenneth Kleeberg | Hudson, IN 46747 | $3,428 |
137 | Kory Willibey | Angola, IN 46703 | $3,424 |
138 | Howard E Buell Rev Living Trust | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $3,360 |
139 | Chris R Baker | Angola, IN 46703 | $3,347 |
140 | Stephen P Bachelor | Angola, IN 46703 | $3,338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”