Market Loss Assistance Program in Tipton County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 936
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Tipton County, Indiana totaled $9,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | O Leon Ratcliff | O Fallon, IL 62269 | $28,397 |
102 | Carlton Trimble Estate | Windfall, IN 46076 | $28,013 |
103 | Gregg Alexander Farms Inc | Kempton, IN 46049 | $27,621 |
104 | Hardebeck Farms | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $27,590 |
105 | Tebbe Land Part II | Tipton, IN 46072 | $26,996 |
106 | Dennis L Henderson | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $26,828 |
107 | Mark Mcquinn Dds | Tipton, IN 46072 | $26,357 |
108 | Robert R Calvin | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $26,331 |
109 | Jacqueline Pierce | Elwood, IN 46036 | $25,270 |
110 | Thomas E Ripberger | Windfall, IN 46076 | $24,744 |
111 | Lex Boyd | Tipton, IN 46072 | $24,689 |
112 | Triple S Smith Farms Inc | Windfall, IN 46076 | $24,429 |
113 | R & M Farms Inc | Sharpsville, IN 46068 | $24,357 |
114 | Matt Letsinger | Tipton, IN 46072 | $24,052 |
115 | Clouser Farms Inc | Greentown, IN 46936 | $23,831 |
116 | Geneva Grishaw | Tipton, IN 46072 | $23,757 |
117 | Tebbe Land Partnership Iv | Tipton, IN 46072 | $23,390 |
118 | Terry Lorts | Sharpsville, IN 46068 | $23,202 |
119 | Richard A Grishaw | Tipton, IN 46072 | $22,795 |
120 | Steven C Hartley | Elwood, IN 46036 | $22,672 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”