Farm Subsidy information
Vermillion County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Vermillion County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 271
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Vermillion County, Indiana totaled $4,322,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James K Little | Cayuga, IN 47928 | $18,791 |
22 | C & S Swinford Farms Inc | Hillsdale, IN 47854 | $16,323 |
23 | Lisa Suzette Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $16,077 |
24 | Matthew Scott Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $16,075 |
25 | Dean Alan Chew | Covington, IN 47932 | $15,164 |
26 | Downs Farms Inc | Dana, IN 47847 | $15,162 |
27 | Daniel Strubinger | Dana, IN 47847 | $14,256 |
28 | Dane Strubinger | Ridge Farm, IL 61870 | $14,256 |
29 | Sally Anne Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $13,766 |
30 | Larry Dean Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $13,763 |
31 | Joseph E Lubovich | Clinton, IN 47842 | $13,713 |
32 | Sfs Farm | Hillsdale, IN 47854 | $13,529 |
33 | William F Farrington | Clinton, IN 47842 | $13,116 |
34 | Steven R Webb | Perrysville, IN 47974 | $12,532 |
35 | Foltz Family Farms L P | Rockville, IN 47872 | $12,427 |
36 | Redman Farms Inc | Dana, IN 47847 | $12,140 |
37 | Keith Hollingsworth | Hillsdale, IN 47854 | $11,980 |
38 | Alta Conservation Acres | Clinton, IN 47842 | $11,391 |
39 | Ernie J Adams | Dana, IN 47847 | $11,277 |
40 | Douglas B Drake | Dana, IN 47847 | $11,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”