Farm Subsidy information
Vigo County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Vigo County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 141
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $5,925,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | D & C Farmer Farms LLC | Flower Mound, TX 75028 | $21,051 |
22 | Brad A Cooper | Dennison, IL 62423 | $20,009 |
23 | Marc Welsh | Dennison, IL 62423 | $19,880 |
24 | J W Dennis | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $19,252 |
25 | Allan Hodges | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $18,423 |
26 | James Thomas Harlan | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $18,120 |
27 | Peter L Krieger | Universal, IN 47884 | $18,109 |
28 | David Whitesell | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $17,430 |
29 | W&j Harlan Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $16,415 |
30 | Don Hooker | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $15,961 |
31 | Matthew A Marrs | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $15,746 |
32 | North River Bottom And Russell | Jersey City, NJ 07302 | $15,471 |
33 | Smwc Real Estate Foundation, LLC | Saint Mary Of The Wo, IN 47876 | $14,383 |
34 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $14,324 |
35 | Jack L Ross Revocable Trust | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $14,192 |
36 | Justin Nussel | Brazil, IN 47834 | $13,951 |
37 | Sarah J Robertson | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $13,892 |
38 | Fred Wilson III | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $13,805 |
39 | , | $13,055 | |
40 | B & G Services | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $12,287 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”