Total Emergency Relief Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 65
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $1,081,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matthew A Marrs | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $15,746 |
22 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $14,324 |
23 | Justin Nussel | Brazil, IN 47834 | $13,951 |
24 | Sarah J Robertson | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $13,892 |
25 | Fred Wilson III | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $13,805 |
26 | B & G Services | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $12,287 |
27 | Stephen Decker Sr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $12,082 |
28 | Kevin Smith | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $11,230 |
29 | John Vencel Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $11,071 |
30 | Lewis Eldon Mccullough & Son | Lewis, IN 47858 | $9,913 |
31 | Kurt Hamilton | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $9,768 |
32 | Larry J Turner | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $9,436 |
33 | Brian Kerns | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $8,941 |
34 | Andrew J Boehler | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $8,905 |
35 | Trevor Scamihorn | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $8,162 |
36 | Caton & Ruppel Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $8,144 |
37 | Don Hooker | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $7,696 |
38 | Dustin Delaunois | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $7,295 |
39 | Robertson Land Trust No One | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $6,841 |
40 | Kenneth Strain | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $6,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”