Loan Deficiency in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,753
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $16,083,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas Ray Stultz | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $133,091 |
22 | Dale Hults Revocable Living Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $132,802 |
23 | Frank L Miklozek Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $127,345 |
24 | Hartmann Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $124,926 |
25 | Jarvis Farm Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $124,902 |
26 | Michael G Puller | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $121,997 |
27 | Jack L Ross Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $121,854 |
28 | Randy Miller | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $120,074 |
29 | Donald E Whallon Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47803 | $119,104 |
30 | Peter L Secondino | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $115,601 |
31 | Michael F Nussel | Brazil, IN 47834 | $112,899 |
32 | Marrs Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $112,315 |
33 | Larry P Byrd | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $109,396 |
34 | Lee A Dalton | Pimento, IN 47866 | $107,483 |
35 | Rex Gene Dalton | Sullivan, IN 47882 | $107,202 |
36 | Robert J Cleghorn | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $106,817 |
37 | Bradley J Cooprider | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $105,226 |
38 | Vigo Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $102,754 |
39 | Sporer Farm Management Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $101,640 |
40 | Michael D Jacks | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $101,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”