Total Conservation Programs in Vigo County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 82
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $549,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenneth A Amos Living Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $7,586 |
22 | , | $7,080 | |
23 | Sycamore Lane Farm LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $6,652 |
24 | James O Mcdonald | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $6,001 |
25 | Felling Farm LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $5,916 |
26 | Trust Of Maria A Fouts And Matthew A Fouts | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $5,576 |
27 | Charles E Freeman | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $5,352 |
28 | , | $4,858 | |
29 | Gary P Walker | Paris, IL 61944 | $4,332 |
30 | James F Stultz | Lewis, IN 47858 | $4,098 |
31 | Phil Bird | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $4,041 |
32 | Harley E Mcdonald Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $3,838 |
33 | Steven Marion | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $3,591 |
34 | Lasheila Drake | The Villages, FL 32162 | $3,502 |
35 | John Kemery | Canton, GA 30114 | $3,444 |
36 | Eric Thomas Sr | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $3,031 |
37 | Keith Holbert | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $2,960 |
38 | James Holbert | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $2,960 |
39 | Margie Whitesell | New Goshen, IN 47863 | $2,855 |
40 | , | $2,658 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”