Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 786
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $1,193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Benjamin James Bird | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $569 |
202 | Harriett E Dalton | Pimento, IN 47866 | $533 |
203 | Westviewfarmheirs LLC | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $527 |
204 | Edward C Mancourt | Clinton, IN 47842 | $518 |
205 | Sally H Ring | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $515 |
206 | Bobbi Mcpeak | Terre Haute, IN 47803 | $504 |
207 | Phyllis K Strole | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $500 |
208 | Justin Farm & Construction Inc | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $500 |
209 | Ruth Ann Lasure | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $479 |
210 | Douglas E Corey | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $477 |
211 | John R Drake | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $471 |
212 | Ron E Wingler | Prairie Creek, IN 47869 | $463 |
213 | Paul F Ladika | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $460 |
214 | Jeanne Endress | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $459 |
215 | Tina J Maher | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $451 |
216 | Donald L Gossett | Dana, IN 47847 | $422 |
217 | Tim Steuerwald | Clay City, IN 47841 | $421 |
218 | Robert E Johnson | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $415 |
219 | Jack Kirchner | Terre Haute, IN 47803 | $411 |
220 | Gelaine Wright | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”