Emergency Conservation Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $376,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Don Hooker | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $4,007 |
22 | William T Durham Estate | Jericho, VT 05465 | $3,818 |
23 | Breanne L Perry Trust | Danville, IL 61834 | $3,741 |
24 | Alyssa A Perry Trust | Danville, IL 61834 | $3,741 |
25 | Molly Kathryn Martin Trust | Spencer, IN 47460 | $3,741 |
26 | Kelsey E Martin Trust | Danville, IL 61834 | $3,739 |
27 | John Klug | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,658 |
28 | Richard Klug | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,658 |
29 | Dan Klug | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,657 |
30 | Larry Gormong | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,612 |
31 | David Whitesell | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,408 |
32 | Lewis Eldon Mccullough & Son | Lewis, IN 47858 | $2,869 |
33 | Jeff Gormong | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $2,730 |
34 | Dale Hults Revocable Living Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $2,569 |
35 | Carl Randolph | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $2,340 |
36 | Willie T Coveleski | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $2,245 |
37 | Herbert Clark Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $2,088 |
38 | Phillip C Carter | Lewis, IN 47858 | $2,068 |
39 | James Watts | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $1,811 |
40 | Barrett M Piety | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”