Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,029
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $6,923,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hansel Hybrids Inc | Paris, IL 61944 | $76,153 |
22 | Randy Miller | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $75,068 |
23 | Brent Donnelly Farms,llc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $75,039 |
24 | Walnut Valley Farms LLC | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $75,037 |
25 | Hayhurst Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $72,792 |
26 | Ronald Lamb | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $67,914 |
27 | Samuel R Plant | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $66,864 |
28 | Jacob Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $66,308 |
29 | Brad A Cooper | Dennison, IL 62423 | $64,969 |
30 | Charles Felling | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $63,134 |
31 | Lewis Eldon Mccullough & Son | Lewis, IN 47858 | $62,491 |
32 | Larry J Turner | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $60,278 |
33 | B & G Services | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $59,435 |
34 | Thomas Ray Stultz | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $58,487 |
35 | Jack L Ross Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $58,208 |
36 | Thomas Harlan | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $56,749 |
37 | Steven Marrs | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $56,240 |
38 | Barrett M Piety | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $56,123 |
39 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $53,068 |
40 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $51,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”