Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,030
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $6,926,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Evan Brand | Shelburn, IN 47879 | $51,002 |
42 | Jeff Gormong | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $50,938 |
43 | James W Koch Jr | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $49,480 |
44 | Bradley J Cooprider | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $48,096 |
45 | Larry Gormong | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $44,801 |
46 | Allan Hodges | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $43,269 |
47 | William L Robertson | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $42,777 |
48 | Phillip Spriestersbach | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $40,823 |
49 | Frank L Miklozek Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $40,489 |
50 | Carter Farms Inc | Lewis, IN 47858 | $39,777 |
51 | John Vencel Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $36,339 |
52 | Steven Strole | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $35,422 |
53 | Stephen M Nussel | Brazil, IN 47834 | $34,417 |
54 | Byrd Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $34,397 |
55 | Marrs Farms LLC | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $31,883 |
56 | James R Drake | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $31,386 |
57 | Pendergast Family Limited Partner | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $31,109 |
58 | Indy Family Farms | Greenwood, IN 46142 | $30,564 |
59 | Jon Hartmann | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $30,012 |
60 | Ivan W Hofmann | Clay City, IN 47841 | $29,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”