Market Gains in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $1,890,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | B & G Services | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $15,840 |
| 22 | Burch Harlan | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $15,815 |
| 23 | Robert Caton | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $11,234 |
| 24 | Hayhurst Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $10,801 |
| 25 | Unger Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $5,650 |
| 26 | Robert S Green | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $5,235 |
| 27 | Scott Beadle | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $5,018 |
| 28 | Judy D Fitzpatrick | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $4,582 |
| 29 | Max Bumgardner | Clinton, IN 47842 | $4,543 |
| 30 | Jackie Strain | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $3,992 |
| 31 | Sisters Of Providence | Saint Mary Of The Wo, IN 47876 | $2,416 |
| 32 | Dale Hults Revocable Living Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $2,364 |
| 33 | Sherry L Lamb | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $2,208 |
| 34 | Margaret L Barbour | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $2,144 |
| 35 | O Virginia Salmon | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $2,040 |
| 36 | Carter Farms Inc | Lewis, IN 47858 | $1,873 |
| 37 | Paul Hauser | Sullivan, IN 47882 | $1,800 |
| 38 | Myron Mccammon | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $1,430 |
| 39 | Woodsmall Farm Supply | Terre Haute, IN 47803 | $834 |
| 40 | Coen Hutchinson | Clinton, IN 47842 | $519 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf