Market Loss Assistance Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,566
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $6,756,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry Gormong | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $53,429 |
22 | Dennis L Jarvis | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $52,966 |
23 | Charles Felling | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $52,701 |
24 | Steven Marrs | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $52,619 |
25 | Thomas Ray Stultz | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $52,209 |
26 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $52,206 |
27 | Michael F Nussel | Brazil, IN 47834 | $49,192 |
28 | Hayhurst Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $48,821 |
29 | Brad A Cooper | Dennison, IL 62423 | $48,275 |
30 | Melvin P Jones | Riley, IN 47871 | $48,194 |
31 | Hartmann Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $45,260 |
32 | Roland Baker | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $45,001 |
33 | Phillip Spriestersbach | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $44,746 |
34 | Jrv Turner Farm | Fishers, IN 46038 | $44,450 |
35 | William J Maher | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $42,534 |
36 | James W Koch Jr | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $42,176 |
37 | Jackie Strain | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $40,887 |
38 | Burton Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $40,517 |
39 | Marrs Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $39,299 |
40 | Hansel Hybrids Inc | Paris, IL 61944 | $36,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”