Total Commodity Programs in Vigo County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 832
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $6,972,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Irwin Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $90,404 |
22 | Marrs Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $90,318 |
23 | Marrs Farms LLC | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $90,067 |
24 | Robert J Cleghorn | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $85,571 |
25 | Randy Miller | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $82,063 |
26 | Caton & Ruppel Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $81,173 |
27 | Steven Marrs | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $78,746 |
28 | Thomas Ray Stultz | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $73,596 |
29 | Chad Morgan | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $72,049 |
30 | B & G Services | Rosedale, IN 47874 | $71,708 |
31 | Woodsmall Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $70,530 |
32 | Hartmann Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $67,816 |
33 | Thomas Harlan | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $67,380 |
34 | Larry J Turner | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $66,920 |
35 | Longview Bank & Trust ** | Paris, IL 61944 | $66,005 |
36 | Michael Jackson Ross | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $60,839 |
37 | John Vencel Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $58,183 |
38 | Burch Harlan Co Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $58,062 |
39 | Bradley J Cooprider | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $57,401 |
40 | Fred Wilson III | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $53,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”