Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Wabash County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 250
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $4,609,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sharon Shellhamer | Wabash, IN 46992 | $11,043 |
82 | Galen Penrod | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $10,349 |
83 | Ramseier Farms Inc | Roann, IN 46974 | $10,314 |
84 | Jacob Peden | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $10,232 |
85 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $10,050 |
86 | Bearcub Farms | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $10,000 |
87 | Gable Cattle Company LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $9,765 |
88 | Gary E Wilson | Wabash, IN 46992 | $9,755 |
89 | Virgil Ozenbaugh | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $9,461 |
90 | Eagle Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $8,717 |
91 | R E Rice Farms LLC | Lagro, IN 46941 | $8,590 |
92 | Michael Allen Bright | Wabash, IN 46992 | $8,496 |
93 | Ronald Wiley | Urbana, IN 46990 | $8,257 |
94 | Joe Daugherty | Wabash, IN 46992 | $8,224 |
95 | Cynthia Jean Schuler | Wabash, IN 46992 | $8,223 |
96 | Watson Farms Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $8,196 |
97 | Renae Kristine Blocher | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $7,742 |
98 | Kent French | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $7,613 |
99 | G & R Custer Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $7,597 |
100 | R & A Sweet Farms Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $7,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”