Conservation Reserve Program in Wabash County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 449
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $1,090,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Oldfather Farms LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,570 |
142 | Thomas E & Melissa A Rice Irrevocable Trust | Andrews, IN 46702 | $1,550 |
143 | Charlotte Harnish | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,543 |
144 | Mary Nan Yarnelle | Fayetteville, AR 72701 | $1,538 |
145 | William Ken Yarnelle | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,538 |
146 | Jenifer Jo Yarnelle | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $1,538 |
147 | Fleck Agri Enterprise Inc | Lagro, IN 46941 | $1,534 |
148 | James Enser | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,530 |
149 | G & R Custer Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,518 |
150 | Milliner Farms Inc | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $1,512 |
151 | Nelson Dyson | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,501 |
152 | Stanley Dyson | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,501 |
153 | Sharon E Michel | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,496 |
154 | Justin D Hoch | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,486 |
155 | James R Bartoo | Urbana, IN 46990 | $1,485 |
156 | Lena Gray | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,419 |
157 | Terry Eads | Urbana, IN 46990 | $1,418 |
158 | Ralph Dawes | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $1,416 |
159 | Tom Williams | Dunlap, IL 61525 | $1,401 |
160 | James Dale | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”