Oilseed Program in Wabash County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 678
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $1,636,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Charles L Miller | Urbana, IN 46990 | $2,859 |
162 | Skyline Hog Farm Inc | Peru, IN 46970 | $2,836 |
163 | Ronald Wiley | Urbana, IN 46990 | $2,830 |
164 | Tate Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $2,822 |
165 | Russell Lee Krom | Roann, IN 46974 | $2,808 |
166 | Blocher Farms Revocable Trust | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $2,787 |
167 | Matthew J Whitesel | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,774 |
168 | Jerry L Enyeart | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,760 |
169 | Max Bechtold | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,701 |
170 | Lynn Blocher | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $2,685 |
171 | Dawes & Son Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,684 |
172 | Ogden Family Farms LLC-maurice Og | Roann, IN 46974 | $2,669 |
173 | Daniel G Schuler | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,662 |
174 | Perry E Small | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $2,661 |
175 | Kent A Little | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $2,660 |
176 | Ernest J Wilcox | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $2,657 |
177 | Daniel Renz | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $2,654 |
178 | Jerry Renbarger | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,634 |
179 | Tedel Farms Inc | Roann, IN 46974 | $2,618 |
180 | Jack E Dyson | Wabash, IN 46992 | $2,610 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”