Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Wabash County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 250
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $4,609,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dale Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $549,066 |
2 | M & C Hill Farms Inc. | Huntington, IN 46750 | $500,000 |
3 | Midwest Veal LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $382,750 |
4 | Treaty Dairy LLC | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $299,130 |
5 | 2001 Inc | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $140,648 |
6 | Richard Brovont | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $123,600 |
7 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $97,129 |
8 | P & L Wilson Farms Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $84,233 |
9 | Brovont Ag Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $62,950 |
10 | Runkel Farms | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $59,767 |
11 | Nathan Vrooman | Wabash, IN 46992 | $55,598 |
12 | Zachary A Schroll | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $55,163 |
13 | Haupert Family Farms Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $50,217 |
14 | Reed Farms | Andrews, IN 46702 | $46,387 |
15 | Bechtold Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $46,185 |
16 | Floor Ag Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $44,684 |
17 | Grossman Farms Inc | Urbana, IN 46990 | $41,141 |
18 | Vada Farm Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $38,890 |
19 | Merrick Farms LLC | Wabash, IN 46992 | $38,326 |
20 | Daniel B Flora | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $37,433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>