Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 659
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Indiana totaled $6,421,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas James Leak | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $44,821 |
22 | Steven Eugene Fellure | Attica, IN 47918 | $43,629 |
23 | Charles Richard Huber | Boswell, IN 47921 | $42,050 |
24 | David L Richardson | Pine Village, IN 47975 | $41,499 |
25 | Martin Seeds Inc | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $41,076 |
26 | Herbert Benjamin Hunter | Ambia, IN 47917 | $39,941 |
27 | Linda Gene Hunter | Ambia, IN 47917 | $39,941 |
28 | Beverly Jane Bradley | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $39,447 |
29 | Dennis Carl Myers | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $39,308 |
30 | Deborah Jean Myers | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $39,308 |
31 | Douglas Wilmer Ransom | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $38,782 |
32 | Donald E Hurt | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $38,560 |
33 | Byron L Berger | Covington, IN 47932 | $38,171 |
34 | Richard Laurel Potter | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $38,015 |
35 | David Stanford Potter | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $37,702 |
36 | Samuel M Verhoeven | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $37,303 |
37 | Stephan Harris Magner | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $35,639 |
38 | Wilma Jean Lang | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $35,615 |
39 | Thomas Andrew Hetrick | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $34,068 |
40 | Perry Joseph Garriott | Attica, IN 47918 | $33,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”