Market Gains in Warren County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 171
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Warren County, Indiana totaled $5,209,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Crossroad Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $1,594,626 |
2 | Clem Farms Inc | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $180,732 |
3 | Richard Louis Potter | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $163,079 |
4 | Richard Laurel Potter | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $155,284 |
5 | David Stanford Potter | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $155,284 |
6 | Steven Ray Lanie | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $138,109 |
7 | Switzer Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $136,884 |
8 | David Frank Brier | Attica, IN 47918 | $126,291 |
9 | A Plus Farms | Pine Village, IN 47975 | $120,643 |
10 | Beverly Jane Bradley | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $109,764 |
11 | Thomas James Leak | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $105,240 |
12 | Thomas Andrew Hetrick | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $89,232 |
13 | Frank Melvin Clark | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $86,136 |
14 | Steven Eugene Fellure | Attica, IN 47918 | $85,071 |
15 | Cloverleaf Farms | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $77,910 |
16 | Gerald William Silver | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $70,114 |
17 | Stephan Harris Magner | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $68,541 |
18 | Martin Seeds Inc | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $60,139 |
19 | Ronald M Crone | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $53,576 |
20 | Donald Neil Ellis | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $51,249 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>