Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Warrick County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 262
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Warrick County, Indiana totaled $1,646,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Will Family Farm LLC | Evansville, IN 47714 | $3,697 |
82 | Robert Stone | Boonville, IN 47601 | $3,514 |
83 | Plassmeier Farms Inc | Lynnville, IN 47619 | $3,408 |
84 | Steve Skelton | Elberfeld, IN 47613 | $3,300 |
85 | Jay Bee Farms Inc | Boonville, IN 47601 | $3,243 |
86 | Rv Schmidt Trust | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $3,233 |
87 | Gil-mar Farms Inc | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $3,131 |
88 | Michel Homestead Farm Inc | Santa Claus, IN 47579 | $2,957 |
89 | Lula F Michel | Santa Claus, IN 47579 | $2,747 |
90 | Steve D Reinke | Dale, IN 47523 | $2,689 |
91 | Kyle Alan Miller | Boonville, IN 47601 | $2,657 |
92 | Patricia Anfield | Evansville, IN 47708 | $2,552 |
93 | Rob Dimmett | Boonville, IN 47601 | $2,502 |
94 | Charley Ann Griggs | Evansville, IN 47714 | $2,464 |
95 | Clinton Will | Evansville, IN 47714 | $2,464 |
96 | L J R Farms LLC | Newburgh, IN 47630 | $2,413 |
97 | Henry K Reibold | Boonville, IN 47601 | $2,288 |
98 | String Acres | Chandler, IN 47610 | $2,198 |
99 | Ralph M Decker | Boonville, IN 47601 | $2,169 |
100 | Adam T Lubbehusen | Dale, IN 47523 | $2,127 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”