Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wayne County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 400
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wayne County, Indiana totaled $14,429,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | The Bath State Bank ** | Bath, IN 47010 | $48,607 |
82 | Thomas Munchel | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $47,228 |
83 | Duane Hill | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $45,778 |
84 | Kitchel Farms LLC | Richmond, IN 47374 | $45,052 |
85 | Gerkin Farms LLC | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $43,498 |
86 | Joseph G Berger | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $41,144 |
87 | Jerry Lane | Williamsburg, IN 47393 | $40,711 |
88 | David Alan Pflum | Connersville, IN 47331 | $40,309 |
89 | Kyle Lumpkin | Modoc, IN 47358 | $39,768 |
90 | Mark R Widau | Richmond, IN 47374 | $39,586 |
91 | Nathan D Williamson | Economy, IN 47339 | $39,440 |
92 | Chris Slonaker | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $39,413 |
93 | James T Fagan | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $38,937 |
94 | F & A Webster Farms Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46804 | $38,761 |
95 | Timothy Frame | Williamsburg, IN 47393 | $38,661 |
96 | Eliason Seed Farms LLC | Centerville, IN 47330 | $38,584 |
97 | Douglas Ernst | Richmond, IN 47374 | $37,932 |
98 | Richard Houseworth | Centerville, IN 47330 | $37,542 |
99 | David Houseworth | Milton, IN 47357 | $37,542 |
100 | Bradley Bihl | Richmond, IN 47374 | $37,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”