Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Wayne County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 95
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Wayne County, Indiana totaled $1,560,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George W Bihl | Richmond, IN 47374 | $22,806 |
22 | Ronald M Rinehart | Hagerstown, IN 47346 | $22,746 |
23 | Dale Mcwhinney | Eaton, OH 45320 | $22,115 |
24 | Don Thurston | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $21,911 |
25 | Heidi Thurston | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $21,911 |
26 | David A Siders | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $19,658 |
27 | Davis Seed Farm Inc | Greens Fork, IN 47345 | $19,456 |
28 | Ralph Crownover | Williamsburg, IN 47393 | $18,427 |
29 | Delores Study | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $18,210 |
30 | Stuart Jay | Webster, IN 47392 | $16,161 |
31 | Jean Ann Austerman | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $15,664 |
32 | Bradley Bihl | Richmond, IN 47374 | $14,848 |
33 | James Study | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $14,085 |
34 | Jack D Study | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $14,085 |
35 | Study Farms LLC | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $13,681 |
36 | Smith Farm Enterprises Inc | Hagerstown, IN 47346 | $13,593 |
37 | Michael W Burt | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $13,508 |
38 | Mark Schlegel | Hagerstown, IN 47346 | $12,717 |
39 | James D Alyea & June Alyea Revoca | Williamsburg, IN 47393 | $11,988 |
40 | James D Howell | Losantville, IN 47354 | $11,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”