Farm Subsidy information
White County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in White County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,819
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in White County, Indiana totaled $380,279,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | I & S Furrer Farms Inc | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $3,599,871 |
2 | Smolek L & G Inc | Idaville, IN 47950 | $3,118,959 |
3 | Schroeder Farms Inc | Reynolds, IN 47980 | $2,098,413 |
4 | Getz Farm Inc | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $2,037,255 |
5 | Bruce W Brown | Brookston, IN 47923 | $1,941,168 |
6 | Moss Farms Inc | Burnettsville, IN 47926 | $1,839,430 |
7 | Pherson Farms Inc | Monticello, IN 47960 | $1,834,009 |
8 | Sommers Farms Inc | Idaville, IN 47950 | $1,818,349 |
9 | Diener Bros Inc | Reynolds, IN 47980 | $1,796,754 |
10 | Monon Valley Ranch Inc | Monon, IN 47959 | $1,777,469 |
11 | Jason A Federer | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $1,765,724 |
12 | R D S Farm Inc | Reynolds, IN 47980 | $1,740,329 |
13 | Kay-den Hill Farms Inc | Idaville, IN 47950 | $1,725,673 |
14 | Stevenson Farms Inc | Brookston, IN 47923 | $1,711,087 |
15 | Holderly Farms Inc | Chalmers, IN 47929 | $1,699,850 |
16 | Morehouse Ag Inc | Brookston, IN 47923 | $1,680,675 |
17 | Richard Bol | Chalmers, IN 47929 | $1,618,797 |
18 | Jon W Thompson | Brookston, IN 47923 | $1,613,157 |
19 | Mkr Farms Lp | Logansport, IN 46947 | $1,587,676 |
20 | Kim Thompson | Brookston, IN 47923 | $1,554,743 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>