Total Emergency Relief Program in Whitley County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 47
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $614,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ryan W Geiger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $67,711 |
2 | Harold Copp Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $59,762 |
3 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $41,008 |
4 | Cynthia Sue Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $41,008 |
5 | Matthew Smith | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $35,761 |
6 | Dairy Enterprise LLC | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $34,327 |
7 | Robert Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $25,191 |
8 | Dean Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $24,965 |
9 | Mary Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $24,965 |
10 | Zumbrun Bros | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,803 |
11 | Chad Johnson | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $20,963 |
12 | Matthew Wineland | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,840 |
13 | Clay Geiger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $18,846 |
14 | Rj Family Farm LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $18,119 |
15 | Nancy L Waugh | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $15,744 |
16 | Hinen Family Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $12,766 |
17 | J & C Nicodemus Family Farms LLC | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $11,649 |
18 | Adam Geiger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $10,093 |
19 | , | $9,377 | |
20 | Anderson Partnership | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $8,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>