Farm Subsidy information
Whitley County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Whitley County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 268
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $5,394,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael Leavell | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,449 |
42 | Troy D Gay | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $5,176 |
43 | Crowe Forest Management LLC | Leo, IN 46765 | $5,059 |
44 | James T Stults | Larwill, IN 46764 | $5,022 |
45 | Ruby Farms LLC | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $5,004 |
46 | Matthew Wineland | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,929 |
47 | Danny D Wilkinson | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $4,888 |
48 | Jeremy B Barron | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $4,834 |
49 | Matthew C Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,823 |
50 | Ayers Family Farms LLC | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $4,700 |
51 | Lana J Zumbrun | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,272 |
52 | Randall G Arnold | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,010 |
53 | Hesting Family LLC | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $3,649 |
54 | Gisela Juillerat | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,601 |
55 | Thomas Charles Zumbrun | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $3,597 |
56 | Buesching's Peat Moss And Mulch Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $3,453 |
57 | John A Baker II | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,428 |
58 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $3,379 |
59 | Jagger Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,316 |
60 | Stacy Petrovas | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”