Total Conservation Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 207
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $427,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Scotty Crance | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,320 |
42 | Bryan P Martin | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,252 |
43 | Matthew Rider | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,225 |
44 | Cole Hinen | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,209 |
45 | Rodney Nissley | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $2,181 |
46 | , | $2,149 | |
47 | Joseph Kessie | Winona Lake, IN 46590 | $2,137 |
48 | Ernie Miller | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,106 |
49 | Steven J Smith | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,994 |
50 | Christopher J Lortie | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,964 |
51 | Brian Conrad | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,957 |
52 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,951 |
53 | Henry E Janda | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,934 |
54 | John M Graber | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,861 |
55 | Lester Hilty | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,861 |
56 | Cheryl L Geiger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,853 |
57 | Priscilla A Schuman | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,812 |
58 | Donny Berry | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,809 |
59 | Otto L Boggs | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,736 |
60 | Dennis M Hearld | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”