SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 114
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $3,869,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Hulda Duncan | Paulding, OH 45879 | $15,947 |
62 | Michael Hinen | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $15,518 |
63 | Jeffrey A Hinen | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $15,364 |
64 | Mark Trabert | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $15,284 |
65 | Emerick Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $15,246 |
66 | Jeremy Hammel | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $15,093 |
67 | Stephen A Moore | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $13,417 |
68 | Tom Bernhard | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $13,127 |
69 | Hesting Family LLC | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $11,916 |
70 | Randall G Arnold | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $10,827 |
71 | Thomas C Derheimer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $10,407 |
72 | Dennis Easterday | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $9,833 |
73 | Christian Kauffman | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $9,649 |
74 | Worrick Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $9,464 |
75 | Kirk Trabert | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $9,254 |
76 | Jack Fletcher | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,559 |
77 | Myer Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,260 |
78 | Lavern Schrader Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,011 |
79 | Jeffrey D Johnson | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,985 |
80 | Josef R Steinbacher | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”