Total Disaster Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 304
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $6,696,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Hesting Family LLC | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $11,916 |
102 | Hesting Homestead Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $11,763 |
103 | Hilger Brothers Farm Partnership | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $11,662 |
104 | Thomas C Derheimer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $11,463 |
105 | Hoffmans Hillcrest Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $11,462 |
106 | Joseph Edgar Anderson | Larwill, IN 46764 | $10,730 |
107 | Anthony Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $10,473 |
108 | Christian Kauffman | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $9,713 |
109 | Jack Fletcher | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $9,488 |
110 | Worrick Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $9,464 |
111 | , | $9,377 | |
112 | Kirk Trabert | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $9,254 |
113 | Merle Anderson | Larwill, IN 46764 | $8,987 |
114 | Daniel A Rowland | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $8,591 |
115 | Anderson Partnership | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $8,527 |
116 | Myer Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,260 |
117 | Lavern Schrader Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,011 |
118 | Josef R Steinbacher | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,925 |
119 | Hubert Steinbacher Jr | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $7,924 |
120 | Charles L Hinen | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”