Farm Subsidy information
Whitley County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Whitley County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 266
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $5,542,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $1,181 |
122 | Anthony K Kuckuck | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,171 |
123 | Richard Green | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $1,159 |
124 | David O Meadows | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,149 |
125 | Maureen Clemons | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $1,129 |
126 | Nancy Shoda | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,126 |
127 | Ruby Farms LLC | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,112 |
128 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,090 |
129 | Bruce A Mitchell | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,074 |
130 | Duane Gillard | Winona Lake, IN 46590 | $1,030 |
131 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $1,027 |
132 | Donald R Ruesch | Larwill, IN 46764 | $1,002 |
133 | Ken J Stine | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $986 |
134 | Otto L Boggs | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $973 |
135 | Julie Duncan | Paulding, OH 45879 | $967 |
136 | Delores J Byall | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $937 |
137 | Johnson Bros Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $927 |
138 | John W Underwood | Larwill, IN 46764 | $896 |
139 | Drats Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $868 |
140 | Kay K Fortman | Larwill, IN 46764 | $861 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”