Total Disaster Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 304
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $6,696,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mccoy Dairy Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,628 |
122 | Brian Conrad | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,408 |
123 | Gary W Ayers | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $7,362 |
124 | James A Argerbright | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $7,292 |
125 | Robert W Laux | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,022 |
126 | Tracy Kuckuck | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $6,921 |
127 | Nancy L Western | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $6,674 |
128 | Papa Perry's Pumpkin Patch | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $6,668 |
129 | Patrick J Murphy | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $6,619 |
130 | Randall K Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $6,552 |
131 | Sam Debolt | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $6,399 |
132 | Danny Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $6,050 |
133 | Edward A Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,937 |
134 | John W Saggars | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,812 |
135 | Hoffman Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,114 |
136 | Harold O Fairchild Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,028 |
137 | Shawn Wait | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,966 |
138 | Chad S Gebert | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $4,950 |
139 | Robert L Watson | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,915 |
140 | Matthew C Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”