Total Disaster Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 304
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $6,696,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Galen Johnson | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,619 |
142 | Cory J Schipper | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $4,559 |
143 | Virgil Jr Hicks | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $4,392 |
144 | Kathi Mckinney | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,310 |
145 | Dale Haupert | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $4,176 |
146 | Danny L Worrick | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,165 |
147 | Weston Jagger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,165 |
148 | Bruce M Trabert | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $4,116 |
149 | John H Schwartz Sr | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $4,107 |
150 | Lynn E Kyler | Jackson Center, PA 16133 | $3,955 |
151 | James A Hartley | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $3,771 |
152 | Zachary Zumbrun | Tennessee Rdg, TN 37178 | $3,756 |
153 | David Wilhelm | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $3,753 |
154 | Pauline C Facks Rev Trust | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,694 |
155 | Robert J Hiss Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,669 |
156 | L & J Sheets Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,640 |
157 | Patrick Nicodemus | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,494 |
158 | Ronald E Smithson Jr | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $3,480 |
159 | J B Sons | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $3,318 |
160 | Paul Kile | Larwill, IN 46764 | $3,308 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”