Farm Subsidy information

Whitley County, Indiana

Total Subsidies in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,256

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $189,082,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Harold Copp Farms IncColumbia City, IN 46725$1,084,665
22Douglas L SchraderColumbia City, IN 46725$1,082,182
23Dean Wendel Farms IncSouth Whitley, IN 46787$1,064,376
24Rex A SchipperSouth Whitley, IN 46787$1,063,736
25Johnson Riverbend Farms IncColumbia City, IN 46725$1,023,132
26Walter Trabert SrColumbia City, IN 46725$1,012,194
27Woll Family FarmsColumbia City, IN 46725$1,004,545
28Michael W MccoyColumbia City, IN 46725$976,784
29Kevin E BollingerColumbia City, IN 46725$974,413
30Wolf Brothers % Ken WolfColumbia City, IN 46725$964,206
31Max E MichelSouth Whitley, IN 46787$945,567
32Barbara SickafooseColumbia City, IN 46725$944,682
33James T CormanyColumbia City, IN 46725$927,578
34Walter Trabert JrColumbia City, IN 46725$922,548
35Hinen Family Farms LLCColumbia City, IN 46725$913,400
36Wayne C LauerColumbia City, IN 46725$902,209
37Tagtmeyer Family Limited PartnershipColumbia City, IN 46725$900,326
38Brent DrewColumbia City, IN 46725$899,823
39Hoffmans Hillcrest Farms IncColumbia City, IN 46725$899,507
40Randall K StudebakerSouth Whitley, IN 46787$887,697

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag