Farm Subsidy information
Whitley County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,256
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $189,082,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Harold Copp Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,084,665 |
22 | Douglas L Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,082,182 |
23 | Dean Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,064,376 |
24 | Rex A Schipper | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,063,736 |
25 | Johnson Riverbend Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,023,132 |
26 | Walter Trabert Sr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,012,194 |
27 | Woll Family Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,004,545 |
28 | Michael W Mccoy | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $976,784 |
29 | Kevin E Bollinger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $974,413 |
30 | Wolf Brothers % Ken Wolf | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $964,206 |
31 | Max E Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $945,567 |
32 | Barbara Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $944,682 |
33 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $927,578 |
34 | Walter Trabert Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $922,548 |
35 | Hinen Family Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $913,400 |
36 | Wayne C Lauer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $902,209 |
37 | Tagtmeyer Family Limited Partnership | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $900,326 |
38 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $899,823 |
39 | Hoffmans Hillcrest Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $899,507 |
40 | Randall K Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $887,697 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”