Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 152
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $152,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,013 |
42 | Ryan Barnett | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $952 |
43 | Edward A Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $816 |
44 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $742 |
45 | David L Zeigler | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $650 |
46 | Robert Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $650 |
47 | Mary Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $600 |
48 | Wilson Keel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $590 |
49 | Anthony Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $544 |
50 | Mark Lamle | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $490 |
51 | Larry A King | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $410 |
52 | Matthew L Zeigler | Logansport, IN 46947 | $408 |
53 | Barbara L Gordon | Avilla, IN 46710 | $338 |
54 | Richard J Kyler | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $308 |
55 | James H Schwartz | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $305 |
56 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $249 |
57 | Beth Ann Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $246 |
58 | John W Saggars | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $241 |
59 | Gary F Christman | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $180 |
60 | Todd Kyler | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”