Counter Cyclical Program in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 632
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $3,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $24,870 |
42 | Richard Cox | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $24,385 |
43 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $24,352 |
44 | Cynthia Sue Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $24,352 |
45 | James A Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $23,990 |
46 | Jenny L Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $23,899 |
47 | Hindbaugh L L C | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,634 |
48 | Zumbrun Bros | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,450 |
49 | Dale Haupert | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $22,241 |
50 | Stanley Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $21,644 |
51 | Robert Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $21,049 |
52 | Dean Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $20,718 |
53 | Mary Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $20,717 |
54 | David A Rouch | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $19,217 |
55 | Steve J Reiff | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $18,206 |
56 | Randall K Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $18,054 |
57 | Larry E Ashbaugh | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $18,000 |
58 | Robert A Egolf | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $17,760 |
59 | Aaron M Oliver | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $17,734 |
60 | Wait Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $17,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”