Conservation Reserve Program in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 461 to 480 of 1,094
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $16,646,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
461 | Delores J Byall | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,433 |
462 | Lucille Shew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,403 |
463 | Harris Trust | Columbia City, IN 11111 | $8,400 |
464 | Paul Fries | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,274 |
465 | Horsefeathers LLC | Paulding, OH 45879 | $8,191 |
466 | William Matthew Henney Family Tru | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,146 |
467 | Carl William Valjack | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,094 |
468 | Alisha D Bauer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $8,061 |
469 | James A Argerbright | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $8,027 |
470 | James J Smith | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $7,980 |
471 | Alex Verba | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,977 |
472 | Michael A Coverstone | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,969 |
473 | Ronald W Reed | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,938 |
474 | Donavon Berry | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,886 |
475 | Helen Hazen | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,867 |
476 | Margaret Kauffman Johnson | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,862 |
477 | Glen D Holycross Unified Credit T | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,854 |
478 | Thomas E Bills | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $7,821 |
479 | Fritz W Haegert | Larwill, IN 46764 | $7,799 |
480 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $7,729 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”